ARM Technical Support Knowledge Articles

SIMULATION ON SILABS DEVICE NOT CYCLE ACCURATE

Applies to: uVision Debugger

Answer


Information in this knowledgebase article applies to:


SYMPTOM

I am debugging my C8051Fxxxx firmware in the uVision simulation. Conditional branch instructions on this device take one less clock cycle to complete when the branch is not taken (e.g. JC, JNC, CJNE, etc). The simulation does not reflect this and adds one more cycle to the cycle counter.

CAUSE

The simulation keeps a list of cycle times for all devices that have a non-standard 8051 instruction timing. This list can only keep one cycle count per instruction. Variable instruction timings for the same instruction cannot be handled by design. The maximum amount of cycles an instruction could take is assumed.

RESOLUTION

Since the simulation assumes the worst case scenario the accuracy is fine for normal application debugging. If for some reason your application has to create timings based on instruction timings please be aware that you will have different timings on hardware. On the Silabs C8051Fxxx series this affects the following instructions:

JC   rel
JNC  rel
JB   bit, rel
JNB  bit, rel
JBC  bit, rel
JZ   rel
JNZ  rel
CJNE A, direct, rel
CJNE A, #data , rel
CJNE Rn,  #data, rel
CJNE @Ri, #data, rel
DJNZ Rn, rel
DJNZ direct, rel

Your application should not rely on cycle timings. This is not considered to be a "best practice" for timing generation.

STATUS

This behavior exists in all versions.

ATTACHED FILES

Request the files attached to this knowledgebase article.

Article last edited on: 2012-08-20 08:29:40

Rate this article

[Bad]
|
|
[Good]
Disagree? Move your mouse over the bar and click

Did you find this article helpful? Yes No

How can we improve this article?

Link to this article
Copyright © 2011 ARM Limited. All rights reserved. External (Open), Non-Confidential